History and Social Theory Reflecting the macro-micro link

PhD course, Spring 2023 at the Faculty of Humanities, SDU

History and Social Theory:
Reflecting the macro-micro link

Dietrich Jung, Institute for History, University of Southern Denmark

This course offers a forum for the discussion of theoretical and methodological questions in prospective and ongoing PhD projects. In order to facilitate this discussion, the seminar will introduce some paradigmatic thinkers representing the two major theoretical traditions that have largely characterized the development of social theory and its application to historical research. On the one hand, micro-sociological approaches which have focused on the individual as level of analysis and emphasized the contingency of social orders, resulting from negotiation processes among individual actors. Macro theory, on the other hand, has departed from the determining role of social structures, emphasizing the subordination of individual actions under the coercive power of structural social contexts. This juxtaposition, in methodological terms often associated with the foundational works of Max Weber (micro) and Emile Durkheim (macro), has been increasingly confronted by new generations of social theorists who called for synthetic rather than polemic theorizing. In the so-called “cultural turn” these theorists emphasized the symbolic constitution of the social world. This shift toward culture has generated an increasing convergence of structural and phenomenological/hermeneutic approaches in the research designs of the humanities. Today, scholars in the humanities apply analytical frameworks that make selective use of concepts and methodologies drawn from both of these two broader traditions in social theory. The course will make its participants familiar with these two traditions, the main questions out of which they have grown, and their applicability in historical research. The course is taught by Dietrich Jung and located at SDU, Odense. It will consist of five seminars, with three hours each, taking place in February and March 2020 with an ECTS weight of 2.5.

After an introductory session, we will take our point of departure in Max Weber’s paradigmatic essay “Objectivity” in Social Science and Social Policy. The third session, then, will look at representatives of structuralist and post-structuralist thought (Claude Lévi-Strauss and Michel Foucault). In the fourth seminar we will turn to the phenomenological and hermeneutical approaches (Clifford Geertz and Charles Taylor). The seminar will end with summing up the development of the two theoretical traditions in light of current discussions about historical studies and “the social” based on a text by William H. Sewell JR. The text will be available as pfd files as soon as the course has been approved. In this seminar we are not aiming at an exegetic reading of the selected texts. On the contrary, the readings serve us to reflect upon theoretical and methodological questions in our own research projects. In order to take place, the course needs a minimum of eight participants.

Schedule:

• 8 February 13.00-16:00:
  Room: Meetingroom Romeo
  Introduction to the seminar and brief presentation of the participants and their PhD projects
  
  
  
• 22 February 13:00-16:00:
  Room: O95
  Max Weber and the fundamental questions of historically oriented social research
  Text: 
  Weber: Objectivity of Social Science and Social Policy
  
  
  
• 1 March 13:00-16:00:
  Room: O96
  Structuralists and Post-Structuralists (three hours)
  Texts:
  Claude Levi-Strauss: Language and the Analysis of Social Laws
  Michel Foucault: Preface and Introduction to The Order of Things and Preface to The History of Sexuality Vol II.
  
  

• 15 March 13:00-16:00:
  Room: O96
  Phenomenological and Hermeneutical Approaches
  Texts:
  Clifford Geertz: Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture
  Charles Taylor: Language and Human Nature
  
  
  
• 29 March 13:00-16:00:
  Room: O96
  Concluding Session
  Text:
  William H. Sewell JR: Refiguring the ‘Social’ in Social Science: An Interpretative Manifesto