Saltwater or freshwater? Difference is large for the climate when we flood low lying areas
SDU researchers find large methane emissions: "Do not flood low-lying areas with freshwater”. Their studies find that freshwater lakes emit much more methane than saltwater lagoons, bogs and wet meadows.
Many countries consider or have already planned to convert low lying farmland into wetlands and thereby save CO2 emissions. The idea is that oxygen-depleted soil in wetlands emits less greenhouse gas than oxygenated cultivated land, thus benefitting the climate.
But such conversions could come with a surprisingly high price for the climate, biologists from SDU warn:
– There is a risk that new wetlands will end up emitting more greenhouse gasses than they take up, says Erik Kristensen, professor of ecology at the University of Southern Denmark.
The problem is specifically tied to freshwater lakes with standing water. When the flooded area is just kept moist, like a bog, the methane emissions go down significantly.
Flooded 10 years ago
Together with colleagues from the Department of Biology, he has followed a large land area named Gyldensteen Strand in Denmark for several years. In 2014, as part of a nature restoration project carried out by the Aage V. Jensen Nature Foundation, the area of cultivated low-lying land was flooded.
As the project is unique in Europe, the foundation funded a series of research projects aimed at learning more about what happens when former low lying agricultural land is converted into wetlands.
This knowledge can help legislators and authorities make the best possible and smartest decisions when agricultural land is taken out of use for wetlands.
– We have conducted this large-scale experiment for several years now, and it shows us that large amounts of methane are released into the atmosphere when land is flooded with freshwater, creating shallow lakes. That is why we say, if you want to convert low-lying coastal areas into wetlands, do it with saltwater if possible, says Erik Kristensen.
The study, co-authored by Kristensen and biologist colleagues, Susan Guldberg Petersen and Cintia Quintana from the Department of Biology, has been published in the journal, Estuaries and Coasts.
Gyldensteen Strand was flooded in two parts: one part with seawater after the removal of dikes, and another part with freshwater. It is the studies of the greenhouse gas emissions from these two different wetland areas that now lead researchers to warn against creating shallow freshwater lakes.
Bogs and wet meadows are better
– We see that when there is standing freshwater in a wetland even if is only 10 cm of water – there is a significant methane emission. The same does not happen in an area flooded with saltwater, says Erik Kristensen.
Therefore, he recommends flooding with seawater where possible. Alternatively, if there is only freshwater for flooding, standing water must be avoided; instead, the area should be laid out as a moist meadow with no standing water.
– The problem is standing water. Our studies show that when a freshwater area is only moist, such as a bog or a wet meadow without standing water, oxygen from the atmosphere will penetrate and help the bacteria in the moist surface consume all the methane that seeps up from deeper oxygen-free layers, explains Erik Kristensen.
Significant amounts of methane
According to the study, significant amounts of methane are at play.
The researchers emphasise that their calculations are extrapolated from measurements and data from the freshwater area of Gyldensteen Strand, a lake called Engsø, which covers 144 hectares and has an average depth of 1 meter.
The assumption for the calculation is that other areas behave somewhat similarly to Engsø.
– Some areas will emit less methane, while others will emit more, but overall, we believe we can extrapolate, says Erik Kristensen.
Equivalent to 750,000 cows
The extrapolated calculations show that if 100,000 hectares are converted into freshwater wetlands with standing water, they will release methane equivalent to nearly 6 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents per year.
Of course, there is also a CO2 benefit from no longer cultivating these areas, which amounts to approximately 3 million tonnes of CO2 equivalents. This should be subtracted from the 6 million tonnes. Therefore, the net result is 3 million tonnes.
In other words, the 100,000 hectares will produce 3 million tonnes more CO2 equivalents than if they were still being farmed. This is equivalent to the emissions of approximately 750,000 cows. There are around 1.5 million cows in Denmark.
Basis for our calculations
We base our calculations on data from the freshwater-flooded Engsø, which covers 144 hectares. According to the researchers' measurements, Engsø emits 303 tonnes of methane each year, equivalent to 8,400 tonnes of CO2 equivalents (approximately 58 tonnes per hectare).
Saltwater inhibits methane bacteria
The other flooded area in Gyldensteen Strand is a coastal lagoon that was created after dikes were removed and seawater allowed to flood the area.
– The numbers are much better in the coastal lagoon. No CO2 is emitted, which is an improvement compared to when it was agricultural land, says Erik Kristensen.
The reason lies in the oxygen-depleted mud under the saltwater and freshwater, where different bacteria come into play.
Methane-producing bacteria thrive in freshwater but are inhibited in saltwater. They are also active when the soil is only moist, but then, atmospheric oxygen helps oxygen-consuming bacteria near the surface consume the methane. Therefore, only small amounts of methane are released from moist soils.
Future plans for low lying land
However, the much lower oxygen content in standing water inhibits the methane-consuming bacteria, allowing large amounts of methane to be released, seeping or bubbling up through the water.
– When we are on field trips to Engsø and wade through the water, we can see bubbles forming where we walk. That's methane being released from the mud where we step, explains Erik Kristensen. /span>
According to him, such methane bubbles should be considered when measuring methane emissions from freshwater wetlands. /span>
– If you only measure the seepage, you get much lower values. But the bubbles should be taken into account to get an accurate picture. I believe that the knowledge we have gained from Gyldensteen Strand should be included in future water action plans so that we can design new wetlands in an intelligent way. Otherwise, there is a risk of creating wetlands that are not climate-friendly, says Erik Kristensen.
Meet the researcher
Erik Kristensen is a professor of ecology at the Department of Biology.
About Gyldensteen Strand
616 hectares of former agricultural land have been acquired by the Aage V. Jensen Nature Foundation and transformed into, among other things, a marine lagoon, a freshwater lake and a reed wetland. Biologists from the University of Southern Denmark have been working on several research projects since the flooding in 2014.