Skip to main content

Calligraphy As Graphically Autonomous Form: A corpus study of Persian calligraphic letterforms with a multimodal approach


Relying on the theory of multimodal social semiotics and the findings of a corpus study of Persian calligraphy (Nastaliq), this paper analyzes calligraphic letter shapes for their degree of independence toward language to make autonomous sense as graphic forms, regardless of conventional meanings within language.

Based on the theory of "articulatory graphetics" (Johannessen, 2010), the paper discusses how characteristics of calligraphic letterforms in Nastaliq can be analogous to the universal set of graphic features. It eventually demonstrates that different practices in Nastaliq calligraphy lead to graphic conventions and can be considered 'acts of graphic articulation.' Accordingly, based on the three factors of 'acting body,' 'tools,' and 'substance,' the paper argues that Nastaliq calligraphy can be seen as an 'articulation event.'

The article also presents a multimodal tentative approach to corpus-based studies of calligraphic letter forms by applying a descriptive schema with two formal systems, SHAPE and ENSHAPENING, as suggested by Johannessen (2010, 2012). This approach is consistent with the fractal-derived principle of self-similarity and adequately accounts for graphic forms in the abstract letter shapes of Nastaliq calligraphy.

Based on the findings of the corpus ‒ 300 images of Persian calligraphy, including individual letters with their extensive forms, second letter forms in Farsi (and obviously in Nastaliq calligraphy), and compound forms ‒ the paper demonstrates that the traditional theory of 'circle and plane' in Nastaliq is described with the synchronic descriptive schema of SHAPE and ENSHAPENING; it manifests itself in the calligraphic letterforms and demonstrates its authenticity.


Aghdashloo, A. (2007), “زمینی آسمانی”, Tehran

Arnheim,R. (1969), “Visual Thinking”, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Arnheim, R. (1974), “Art and Visual Perception: The physiology of the Creative Eye”,  University of California Press

Baratzadeh, L. (2006), خوشنویسی در ایران, Tehran

Bayani,M. (1984), “خط فارسی”, Tehran

Bezemer, J., Jewitt, C., Diamantopoulou, S., Kress, G. & Mavers, D. (2012), “Using a Social Semiotic Approach to Multimodality: Researching Learning in Schools, Museums and Hospitals”, NCRM Working Paper

Boeriis, M. & Holsanova, J. (2012), “Tracking Visual Segmentation: Connecting Semiotic and Cognitive Perspective”, University of Southern Denmark

Bezemer, J. & Jewitt,C. (2010), “Multimodal Analysis: Key issues. In: L. Litosseliti (ed)”, Research Methods in Linguistics. London: Continuum. pp. 180-197

Bezemer, J. & Kress, G. (2008), “Writing in Multimodal Texts: a Social Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning”, Written Communication 25(2), pp.166-195

Boeriis, M. & Norgaard, N. (2013), “Architectural Discourse : The Material Realization of Framning and Discourse in a University Building”, 37(64), University of Southern Denmark

Bolkhari, H. (2006), “و حدت وجود و وحدت شهود:مبانی عرفانی هنر و معماری”, Tehran

Dondis, Donis. A. (1974), “A primer of visual literacy”, New York

Eghbal, A. (1990), در ایران"  " شعر و موسیقی, Tehran

Falsafi, A. (2000),  "بررسی و شناخت کشیده ها در خط نستعلیق", Tehran

Ghazi Monshi, A. (1988),"گلستان هنر", Tehran

Ghelich Khani, H. (1993), “رسالاتی در خوشنویسی و هنرهای وابسته”, Tehran

Ghelich Khani, H. (1994), “فرهنگ واژگان و اصطلاحات خوشنویسی و هنرهای وابسته ”, Tehran

Iedema, R. (2003), “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-Semiotic Practice”, University of New South Wales

Irani, A. (1983), “پیدایش خط و خطاطان”, Tehran

Jewitt, C. (2009), “The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis”, LONDON & NEW YORK

Jewitt,C. & Bezemer, J. (2010), “Research methods in linguistics”, London

Johannessen , Christian M. (2010) , “Forensic analysis of graphic trademarks, A multimodal social semiotic approach”, PhD. Thesis. Odense: department of Language and Communication

Johannessen , Christian M. (2012), “ A Corpus- Based Approach To Danish Toilet Signs”, RASK - International journal of language and communication (39)

Kress, G. (2010), “Multimodality, A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication”, London and New York

Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001), “Multimodal Discourse; the modes and media of contemporary communication”, London

Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2002), ”Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour”, London

Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996), “Reading image”, New York

Maagaard, C. (2013), “Narrating a future pictorially: Temporality in architectural renderings”,  RASK - International journal of language and communication (0909)-8976

Meidani, M. (2008), “ارتباط خوشنویسی و موسیقی ایرانی”, Tehran

Ormavi, S. (2006), “الرساله اشرفیه فی النسب التالیفیه، ترجمه بابک خضرائی”, Tehran

Schimmel, A. (1990), “Calligraphy and Islamic Culture”, New York

Unsworth, L. (2001), “Teaching Multiliteracies Across the Curriculum; Changing Contexts of Text and Image in Classroom Practice”, Philadelphia 

Van Leeuwen, T. (2005), “Typographic Meaning”, Visual Communication 4(2)